魏燕珊

Lawyer Wei is good at civil and commercial litigation and has rich experience. The main types of cases he handles include: company construction project contract disputes, equity transfer disputes, private loan disputes, sales contract disputes, lease contract disputes, marriage and family disputes, and recourse rights disputes. He has extensive experience in criminal defense and handles mainly types of crimes: illegally absorbing public deposits, fraud, counterfeiting of registered trademarks, smuggling, drug trafficking, rape, gambling, and border crossing crimes. With rich practical experience in mediation and negotiation, he also provides foreign-related legal services for companies going overseas, links legal resources from various places, and is committed to providing customers with solutions that have both legal depth and commercial warmth.

Representative cases:

1. Participated in a group control dispute involving a Shenzhen family enterprise, and provided the group with various legal services such as the reorganization of directors, supervisors and senior management, assisting the company to get back on track and return to normal production and operation order under the leadership of the actual controller;

2. Company construction project dispute case: On behalf of the construction party, we negotiated with the contractor (a central enterprise in Beijing). Finally, the contractor agreed to our request and paid us more than 700,000 yuan for the entire project in one go, successfully saving the parties involved from the cumbersome litigation process of going to Beijing for commercial arbitration;

3. Company sales contract dispute case: winning judgments were obtained in the first and second instances. Mediation was carried out during the implementation stage, and finally a settlement was reached with a very low discount of exempting 60,000 yuan of delayed performance fines and a plan that maximized our interests. The parties finally recovered all the money of more than 2 million yuan within 20 days;

4. Crime of illegally absorbing public deposits: In the first-instance judgment, the judge adopted our defense opinion and sentenced our client to a suspended sentence;

5. Minors suspected of rape: within 37 days of detention, the application for compulsory measures will be changed to bail pending trial, and the family of the suspect and the victim will be assisted to reach a criminal understanding. The police finally accepted our defense opinion of insufficient evidence and made the decision to withdraw the case.